Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

Steaming into Matlock with rail link hopes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 February 2008
Plans to extend a historic rail track are set to get the green light signalling full steam ahead for Matlock station.
The proposals, which have been under consultation for several years, could finally see Peak Rail steam and diesel trains chugging into Matlock Station.

The heritage rail firm currently runs services on a 3.7-mile stretch of track from Matlock Rive
rside to Rowsley.

Keith Lumley from Network Rail said a couple of minor problems needed to be addressed before they could give the go-ahead but was confident a lease could be signed by the end of April or early May.

Mr Lumley added: "There are a few issues concerning the method of operation and safety but they should be easily resolved.

"Ourselves, Peak Rail and the officers of Rail Regulation will be meeting in the next couple of weeks. Hopefully Peak Rail will be able to come back to us with resolutions to the difficulties.

"It is looking very positive for Peak Rail and is a step in the right direction."

It is also hoped plans to restore the rail link will also increase tourism in the town.

Bosses of the Dales attraction have spoken of their intention to reopen the line between Matlock and Bakewell, within the next ten years. The move into Matlock Station marks the first stage of these plans.

Mr Lumley said in theory a connection for East Midlands Trains to Rowsely would be also possible, once the Peak Rail's track was up and running.

Managing director of Peak Rail, Jackie Statham, said she did not want to comment on the proposals until after the meeting with Network Rail but added it had always been Peak Rail's hope to go in to Matlock Station.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 February 2008 3:41 PM
  • Source: Matlock Mercury
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Lone Starr,

Matlock Bath 14/02/2008 13:41:35
Excellent news - I hope it can be achieved this year. It will be a fantastic boost for the town to see steam trains in the station once more.
Best of luck with the final negociations!
2

Observer123,

17/02/2008 13:01:53
A very positive announcement, the Down platform at Matlock station has been out of use and overgrown for far too long, let us hope the move leads to a positive regeneration of the station as a whole, and certainly to increased patronage by tourists and visitors to the region.
3

,

17/02/2008 18:16:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Yorkie21,

19/02/2008 17:59:46
This will be really good news for Peak Rail and for Matlock assuming that an agreement can be reached with Network Rail. Personally i doubt whether we will see steam loco's standing in Matlock Station until the end of the year or early next year.
One of the letters commented that the loop had not been used obviously the writer cannot remember Matlock Town trips to Wembley, Carlisle, Nuneaton, Weymouth, the queen visiting, the steam services in the 1980's or various deliveries of rolling stock to Peak Rail
5

Chris Spencer ,

Wirksworth 22/03/2008 11:55:31
What a wonderful idea, let's burn pure carbon for the fun of it ?!

I was just thinking we dont have enough carbon monoxide or sulphur around anyway, and we could all do with a bit more acid rain and cancer.

Sorry about the sarcasm but I think you get my point.

I work for Biofuels Media and can arrange a biodiesel study or supply if anybody wants to get the same result using cheaper, cleaner recycled fuel sources, which has nothing to do with Indonesian Palm or deforestation crops...

Its recycled transesterified waste fryer oils which require no engine modification and reduces carbon emissions by 78%, Sulphur by 100% and has fewer carcinogenic particulate emissions too.

Maybe if Matlock became more environmentally friendly, it would boost local tourism and trade for the people of Matlock, not just for Sainsbury's !


6

not too far away,

derbyshire area 26/03/2008 20:33:53
id like to answer chris` last comments with some hopefully helpfull responses about the carbon issue.

steam trains dont produce carbon in the same way as petrol vehicles do, the carbon from a steam locomotive is around seventy percent heavy carbon which doesnt mix with airborne constituents like petrol burning engines do,and usually falls within a few metres of the track, considering the vast technical knowledge regarding carbon emmisions of steam vice petrol and deisel steam is both environmentally freindly as well as ecologically far better than petrol, some countries such as germany and switzerland are building new versions of steam locomotives whose benefits far outweigh their deisel or petrol cousins.

not to mention that when matlock station comes up and running the large carpark at rowsley station can be used to reduce the traffic volume in matlock by training visitors into the area,depends on how the planning works on this.

we unfortunately live in a very beautifull place, if we dont embrace a certain level of tourism then the basic facilities we have wont be paid for, wher ei live is better scenery than matlock, but weve nothing really provided for tourism, matlock on the other hand has the potential for a better tourist market that can be planned to aid the locals better,which would you rather have, people jamming matlock up by car or coming by rail into an integrated centre with rail,steam and bus links all together.

congratulations to all involved on the project when it finally runs the first new steam service into matlock station,thats when we start looking at how it all works for the local population,as both tourist line and local transportation system, much as the welsh highalnd railway or mid norfolk railways have become.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.