Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 16th March 2010

Anger at plans to increase size of Matlock footbridge

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 January 2008
Campaigners fear that plans to raise the sides of a controversial footbridge in Matlock will make it uglier and more intimidating.

Network Rail wants the thick metal walls of the bridge at Matlock Railway Station to be raised to 1.8 metres after youths were spotted jumping off the structure.

But Snitterton Road resident Isabella Stone from the Matlock Footbridge Campaign fears the bridge will be made worse if the work is carried out.

She added: "I've seen a couple of lads jumping over the wall onto the station roof myself, but I think there'll be another safety issue if the sides do get raised.

"The bridge is L-shaped and a very high wall would make it easier to lurk in the corner, which would make the whole monstrosity even more intimidating."

Matlock Civic Association believes the raised wall plans add weight to their argument that the bridge should be replaced with access along Snitterton Road.

Secretary Ken Parker said: "These proposals would make the ugly footbridge even uglier, and even more of a potential crime scene."

And Matlock mayor David Barker also said he would like to see the footbridge removed but doubted that would happen due to a lack of acceptable alternatives.

Derbyshire Dales District Council said it was still waiting to hear about Network Rail's proposals.

The Matlock Footbridge Campaign has collected over 850 signatures from people opposed to what it describes as the hideous structure which has ruined the surrounding area.

A spokesman for Network Rail said: "There have been concerns that people can jump over onto the roof so the sides will be raised."

He added that the bridge was owned by the council so although Network Rail was advising them, the final decision would be authorities.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 January 2008 1:21 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Observer123,

10/01/2008 21:55:44
Naturally, we've been here before. The bridge is certainly not aesthetically pleasing, and yes, the concerns about intimidation are probably quite valid. Sadly, we live in a society in which a proportion of the young have little respect for private property, and are always seeking to test the boundaries of respect and toleration. Network Rail is no doubt concerned about the possibility of litigation resulting from a crazed teenager falling from the bridge/station building and breaking a few bones on impact with terra firma. It will instantly appear to be neglect on the part of the company, whereas any sane individual cannot fail to realise that the blame lies wholly and solely with the socially challenged miscreant.

As we live in a compensation culture, anyone in responsibility naturally attempts to avoid the possibility of claims being brought against them. Therefore, the bridge will no doubt remain, used by those who wish to, while those who dislike the structure will use Snitterton Road instead. It is, however, highly unlikely that the bridge will be removed, as it would involve immense loss of face, cause disruption to the Derwent Valley Line and provoke questions as to why a massive amount of money had been effectively wasted (at present one has, at least, something to show for the investment).
2

Minnie Mouse,

Derbyshire 12/01/2008 10:20:13
So the Snitterton Road whingers are at it again! Get a life, wake up and realise that the bridge is here to stay and stop trying to run Matlock down!As for the matlock Mercury, when will you run a positive story about Matlock. Sensationalist press stories are only doing more damage to our town's reputation. Where is your social conscience?
3

INTERESTED LOCAL,

12/01/2008 17:25:21
Well said Minnie Mouse. The railway (don't forget to say ugly!) bridge is where it is because of the Civic Association and the Town Council.

The road bridge IS one-way and when the job is finished it should improve the quality of life in and around that area. Personally I would have preferred two way for cars and buses but there again the mighty trio of Councillors B & B and the Civic Association managed to retain the blasted columns outside the Bank.

PLEASE let us all now try to sell Matlock instead of the Town Council and Civic Association carping about problems which they themselves have helped to create.

The comment about the Mercury is more than appropriate as well Minnie. The Cllr Burfoot article in the same issue shows where the Mercury loyalties lie.
4

,

13/01/2008 10:46:04
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

Maryjane,

Matlock 24/01/2008 17:48:48
Maybe the moaning residents of Snitterton would like us all to pay even more council tax to fund a new bridge.If the station bridge is such an eye sore lets just remove it.....oh no can't do that it would mean the so called 'Moaning residents' would have to put their energy into exercising legs instead of their mouths.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.