Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 1st August 2010

Dales set for top level tax rise

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 March 2008
Dales residents look set to see their purses squeezed after the district council unveiled plans for a 4.9 per cent council tax increase – and announced three more years of sweeping budget cuts.
The increase almost reached the government's maximum limit of five per cent.

And despite a year of extensive cutbacks, including service closures and compulsory job losses, the council has announced an extra £1.5million needs to be saved over the next three years.

But other groups whose budgets make up the tax bill – including the fire service and county council – kept their increases below inflation.

This means overall council tax bills will increase by 3.9 per cent, just below the current inflation rate to an average of £1,419.67 excluding town and parish precepts.

The tax plans will need to be approved by councillors at a meeting on Monday.

District council chief executive David Wheatcroft said the authority was pleased to have managed the £1million budget saving needed in the last year.

"I think we have done it in a balanced and sensible way, but I also recognise that we have got to do more," he said.

"We have identified a way forward and are again looking at the same sort of thing."

Mr Wheatcroft said hard times lay ahead for the district council, as they will be given the minimum government grant level for the next few years.

"This year we've got a one per cent government grant and for the next two years we are going to get half a per cent.

"Because our property is valuable they say we should be raising money through council tax."

"It will result in us having to save £500,000 each year for three years, so we are going to get progressively worse off."

Mr Wheatcroft said further savings would be gathered by careful budgeting, private sector contracts and sharing services with other areas.

"It's also about getting the property and land we have to work harder for us," he added.

He said the district council needed less space now, and had sold their Bath Street offices in Bakewell and planned to demolish the town hall annex.

Amber Valley borough council agreed an increase of three per cent in their share of overall council tax this week - the second lowest increase in the county.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 March 2008 9:35 AM
  • Source: Matlock Mercury
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

ragdolly anna,

matlock bath 07/03/2008 12:31:34
How can this increase be justified when, in a town the size of Matlock, which feeds so many villages we have no sports centre, no decent recyling facilities, no cinema, no theatre and now, if rumours are to be believed, we are about to lose our swimming pool.

It is outrageous and the council should feel ashamed of the useless job that they are doing.
2

Lone Starr,

Matlock Bath 07/03/2008 13:43:38
We are not getting good value-for-money from our District Council, particularly in Matlock. I don't think the tax-hike is justified at all, especially given the number of service cuts that we are experiencing. How about getting rid of some of the corporate fat-cats in the council. I bet they account for a sizeable chunk of the payroll, and no-one would notice the difference if we got rid of them.

I agree with "ragdolly anna" that the services in Matlock are dreadful. Compare Matlock with other towns in the district, and you see that we are not getting equal treatment. I have also heard the rumour about the Lido closing.

As tax-payers in Derbyshire Dales, I think we should call for the resignation of the council leaders, and we should get a team in that could do the job properly.

Shame on the District Council - PLEASE GIVE US BETTER VALUE FOR MONEY.
3

Yorkie21,

08/03/2008 16:14:03
When is the next election?
4

Mikey,

09/03/2008 07:21:01
I agree with all the previous comments. The District Council are an absolute disgrace and if it were possible, which it isn't, they should be sent packing immediately. If these people had jobs in the real world, not local government, they would have been sacked after a month.

Despite the fact that the District Council's Head Offices are in Matlock we are teated like a third, or even fourth rate rate town. As an example, Ashbourne, which no doubt is where a large number of the elected members live, has 5 Public Toilets and no threat of any of them closing. What do we get? 1 Toilet.

There are many other examples of Matlock being run into the ground whilst other towns get most of the money.

The District Council knew years ago, and admitted it in the press, (it's all in the records), that they were facing financial meltdown, but they sat on their laurels until it became an absolute crisis before they started to save any costs.

We are all going to pay heavily from our pockets for their complete ineptitude, and worse still we will have many more services and facilties slashed.

One other thing, why is it that senior officers in the District Council get paid substantially more than the equivalent officers at the County Council?

Well I think we all know the answer to that! They really are shameless.
5

Suzie J,

Derbyshire Dales 10/03/2008 11:41:50
I am wondering if the people commenting have actually read the article. Derbyshire Dales District Council gets almost all of the money it has to spend from the Government in Westminster. That's Gordon Brown and his ministers. Gordon and his chancellor believe that because this is a pretty place, we are all well off, and so not in need of money from Central Government. As a result, it gives the lion's share of the Derbyshire grants to places in north east Derbyshire.
6

Mikey,

11/03/2008 21:11:11
And I'm wondering Suzie J, whether you have actually read the comments people have made.

Or did you just want to tell us how it's not the nice District Council's fault, but the nasty National Government's.

Our gripes have little to do with what Central Government allocate to our District Council, but it's virtually all about how that money is spent, or more specifically where it not spent.

The District Council see fit to spend a dis-proportionate amount of money in Ashbourne and Bakewell, not in Matlock. Matlock is really sufferring because of this.

Additionally they knew their finances were in trouble a long time ago, but they continued over spending knowing they faced trouble down the line. We are now all going to pay for this. I believe it is called financial mis-management. Some might also say it's incompetance.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.