Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 15th March 2010

Protest victory as Matlock mast scheme is turned down

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
04 September 2008
Residents and councillors are celebrating after plans for a controversial phone mast were turned down – despite officers' recommendations.
Derbyshire Dales planning officers wanted the application by Telefonica O2 UK for a 20-metre tower at Farley Hill in Matlock to be granted.

However, district councillors rejected the recommendations at a meeting on Tuesday and voted for refusal on
the grounds the mast would have a detrimental impact on the landscape.

After the meeting resident Richard Durran, who lives close to the proposed site at Mount Pleasant Farm, said: "I'm absolutely delighted.

"My faith in local government has taken a bit of a boost."

An application for a telecommunications tower for Mount Pleasant Farm was refused last year but two applications – for a mast a Bent Lane, Hackney and apparatus at Mount Pleasant Farm – have already been granted.

At the meeting resident Richard Whiteside, who lives at Farley Hill, appealed to councillors to refuse the plans on the same grounds as the application submitted last year.

He said: "Moving its position by nine metres will not render it any less hideous. I urge the planning committee to reject it."

Mr Durran added: "I ask councillors what it would be like for you to live in close proximity to three masts possibly four. I would compare it to living in a microwave oven."

Cllr Sue Burfoot said she felt strongly about the application, against officers recommendations.

She added: "There are two masts already. When is enough enough?

"Surely we have not always go to pander to the competitive nature of the telecommunications people. Two is quite enough. They are ugly and an eye sore."

Council leader Cllr Lewis Rose said he had sympathy for the planning officers who recommended approval for the masts on Government advice.

He added: "If it goes to appeal the Government will do what it has to do whether we like it or not."

Darley Dale Parish Council had objected to the plan suggesting that mobile phone companies shared masts in the area.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 10:07 AM
  • Source: Matlock Mercury
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

GAQ,

Matlock 06/09/2008 17:33:29
So, I guess now 3G coverage in Matlock for users not on Three will never happen?

I am sure the reason why they do not want to share is that it may degrade the service? I doubt there are no repercussions in sharing 2 masts for such a service across the 4 'big' networks...
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.