Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Signs of the times for Dales traders?


Restaurant owner claims business is under threat after latest council dispute

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
24 July 2008
A Chinese restaurant owner says she could be forced out of business in the latest dispute over shop signs in the Dales.
Julie Lu Chen has been threatened with a £2,500 fine if she fails to remove signs from her Matlock Bath businesses by tomorrow.

And it comes in the wake of previous disputes at Maazi Restaurant and The Bee Tree in Matlock, where Derbyshire Dales District Council eventually backed down.

Mrs Lu Chen had two signs shipped from China for the Golden River Restaurant and Panda Cafe on South Parade.

But district council planners told her they were too big and colourful for a conservation area.

Mrs Lu Chen said: "Everything's wrong and I can't carry on like this. I'm just trying to make a living and employ people.

"They really are making it so difficult when I thought they would support businesses like mine."

After a series of failed attempts to negotiate, Mrs Lu Chen received a letter from the district council's solicitor giving her a week to remove the signs or face a £2,500 fine.

Mrs Lu Chen hoped to challenge the council, but was worried she would be fined if the signs were still up this weekend.

She said: "Lots of the other signs are much bigger and more colourful than mine. I've had no help at all.

"The council are just trying to give me trouble," she added.

Matlock Bath Parish Council had supported the plans when originally submitted.

Cllr Belinda Heaney said: "We were positive and thought they looked fine."

But in a letter to Mrs Lu Chen, head of planning Paul Wilson said the signs harmed the character of the building "due to the combination of their design, illumination, positioning, materials, lighting and finish".

Maazi owner Irfan Shabir said: "The most annoying thing is that there is no consistency in the decision-making.

"There are businesses that have called for gigantic signs like Sainsbury's and others. But some small businesses get hit.

"All we are trying to do is let our customers know what we are and what we stand for. It has an impact on your business."

No-one from the district council was available to comment about its policy on signs.

The full article contains 379 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 10:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Unsure,

Matlock 24/07/2008 13:53:47
The council needs to set out clearly what the sign policy is for both conservation areas and others then instruct ALL traders in the town including Mrs Chen to comply within 6 months. Once this period is up the rules should be strictly enforced for ALL. Until this is done Mrs Chens sign should stay, otherwise we are penalising some traders and not others.
2

darleydame,

24/07/2008 20:18:43
Once again there is no rhyme or reason ti our councils decisions. The resturant across the road has very bright blue signs that clash with the red paint of the building but nothing is done about that.
Dale Rd has some really horrible signs in windows- the kebab shop hasnt even got theirs on straight! I agree with 'unsure' the council neeeds to get its act together.
3

Confused by our planners,

Matlock 24/07/2008 20:57:15
This is the same council which took 18 months to approve the planning permission for my new signage which happened to be smaller and more sympathetic with the surroundings than the ones which were already in place! The final discussion included the planning officer questioning why signs were needed on the premises!!

As I said to them at the time and i'll say it again, they have no idea on how to positively develop the area, the economy and the future of the town. Not quite sure what vision they have for the town but looking at the recent planning debacles it makes you wonder!
4

Lone Starr,

Matlock Bath 24/07/2008 21:11:46
The signs seem alright to me. As the premises are set back off the road, anything smaller would not be seen.

Do the council actually want discourage small businesses? Seems like that to me.

I also agree with "darleydame" that there are several other shops that are more out-of-place, but nothing ever seems to be done to them.
5

Mr Vanilla,

Matlock 24/07/2008 21:44:09
Nothing wrong with the signs outside that shop IMO, it's once again, bored planners, with nothing else to do, trying to make themselves some work.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.