Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 24th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Matlock Mercury site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Survey highlights Sainsbury's impact on Matlock traders



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2008
A survey of traders has delivered a damning verdict on the impact Sainsbury's and the new relief road have had Matlock.
In a survey by campaign group Belper Against Tesco Superstore, over 87 per cent of business owners said less people visited the town centre on foot since the superstore and relief road were built.

Drops in sales were reported by 62 per cent of th
ose interviewed, and 65 per cent said they now had less customers.

Group spokesman Andy Minion said: "The main reaction was one of deep depression.

"We weren't prepared for the sheer scale of the effects the shopkeepers told us about and how they were only too happy to speak to us.

"They said how it wasn't just Sainsbury's or the relief road, but the combination of the two," added Mr Minion.

Mr Minion said there was very little support for the development, and the term "ghost town" had been used several times by traders.

Less than three per cent thought Sainsbury's would improve the vitality of the town centre.

Of the traders who felt Sainsbury's and the relief road harmed trade, 57.5 per cent said it would have a significant impact on their future business.

Volunteers from the campaign group surveyed 43 Matlock businesses one morning in March.

The six-question survey was drawn up by group member Ali Hubbard, who designs questionnaires for a living.

A county council spokeswoman said the authority had not been involved in the report and therefore could not comment on its content.

"Derbyshire Dales District Council gave planning permission for the Sainsbury's development and we advised on the building and design of the road which the district council approved," she added.

"We are aware that some traders in Matlock are unhappy with the changes to the road system. We've met with representatives to discuss their suggestions for improvement and we're looking at some of them to see if they might be feasible."

Sainsbury's said it stores brought jobs and skills to communities.

A spokeswoman said: "We invest strongly in the communities we serve – for £52m-worth of Active Kids sport and activity equipment is being donated to schools across the UK.

"We are confident that there is room in the in this highly competitive market for all formats and that our customers benefit from lower prices, increased choice due to a wider product range and improved quality on fresh food," she added.

To see the full report click here.



The full article contains 437 words and appears in Matlock Mercury newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 May 2008 1:09 PM
  • Source: Matlock Mercury
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
2
1

Yorkie21,

14/05/2008 20:38:13
Let's continue to knock Sainsbury's - it was very hot on Saturday / Sunday - reason becuase Sainsbury's wanted to sell more ice cream / soft drinks / bbq! Has it ever occurred to people that we are in stagflation and the goods / services that are being offered people don't necessarily want them them. Also the survey was carried out "one morning in March" not the best time to carry out a survey?
2

darleydame,

15/05/2008 16:40:13
I actually use the town more since Sainsbury's has been built as I always did my shopping in Chesterfield/Belper or Alfreton. Its not a long walk from Sainsburys into the town but we do not really have a great variety of shops to make people want to come into the townto shop, very few clothes stores and nothing for men thats reasonably priced.
But would I pay the costly parking charges if I didnt live in the area and have the parking permit- I don't think so!
3

Lone Starr,

Matlock Bath 15/05/2008 18:08:49
I agree that we shouldn't necessarily place all of the blame at the door of the supermarket giant. At the end of the day, it was the district council who should have been looking after our interests, and I feel badly let down. It is the district council who decided to make the new car park a pay-and-dismay affair (the one next to the bus/train station). The original (albeit scruffy) free car park was a definite magnet for passing trade. I don't think that many people realise that they can use the Sainsburys car park for 2 hours without charge - and they don't need to use the supermarket. However, it is a fair trek to the town centre, and you might not survive the terror of crossing the motorway into town (the pedestrian crossings need to be sorted before someone is knocked over).

I plead - if anyone from the district council is reading these comments - PLEASE do something to bring back visitors to Matlock. Everything and everyone is suffering, and we are in danger of becoming another clone-town. 2 hours free parking, better pedestrian routes into town, cleaner pavements and toilets, and a generally better image is what this town desperately needs.
4

Fowey,

15/05/2008 19:26:37
It's not sainsurys that is the problem. It's the one that arrived at the same time as the superstore-no free parking.
No free nipping to the bank/post office/chemist. Nipping now costs money.
5

vb,

16/05/2008 10:15:06
The main change i have found it that on Dale road, every since they put in the one way sytem it has put me off wanting to drive down there or go to matlock bath- knowing that i have to go one way way route all the way past sainsburys and back again (I realise though that in a way it is good as crown square is alot quieter) Dale road's shops seem to be closing, Tsar one of the best has now relocated and the whole road needs an overall. I think Matlock needs a lift and i really hope the council will be taking on board all the comments.
6

Bruce Gee,

matlock 16/05/2008 15:22:07
I agree people are not using dale road and the shops are going, so would you not think the council would welcome investment on dale road because we are trying to invest £5,500,000.00 into dale road and we are now being given the run around by DDDC 2 weeks before the planning committee sit to decide on the future of the development knowing full well that their demands are impossable to forfill in time, we are just about out of energy with this and ready to pull up sticks board up the hotel and go,
If we did not have such support from the public thats exactly what we would do believe me.

Kind Regards
Bruce
7

JOHN WINNARD,

16/05/2008 15:39:13
I remain totally in favour of a hotel development on this site.

I suspect that Mr Gee could be referring to the normal and proper "suggestions" which might have been made by the Planning Officer(s) re amendments which could make the application more acceptable within the planning framework.

If this is the case the £5.5 million is irrelevant since public interest also demands control over developments such as this.

Mr Gee does of course have the opportunity to appeal should the application be rejected.

I sincerely hope he will work with the planners because we certainly need the hotel but not at any price.
8

Bruce Gee,

matlock 16/05/2008 15:56:25
Mr Winnard

thank you for your support, of course we will work with the planners as much as we can to get this through.

kindest regards
bruce
9

anony mouse,

17/05/2008 15:43:30
Stop blaming Sainsbury's for everything!. The public wanted the store and they got it and they USE it!. Somerfield is still busy aswell.. Belper, Ashbourne, Buxton etc etc all have big superstores and thriving town centres. Matlock on the other hand offers sod all. Why on earth the District Council is not trying to develop the town centre to attract new shops in larger sustainable premises is beyond me!!! All the investment and development seems to be going to Ashbourne where they've got their new retail park and DIY centre. R.I.P. Matlock thanks to the Town and District Council. Sainsbury's is the only thing that is probably saving Matlock by the skin of its teeth!
10

Yorkie21,

17/05/2008 19:49:03
...and Ripley is getting a Premier Inn (or Travelodge)may be Amber Valley Borough Council are wanting to promote Ripley as the gateway to the Derbyshire Dales
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.