Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Wind turbines plan set to fail

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 April 2007
AMBITIOUS plans to harness the green energy of the wind at Carsington look set to fail at the first hurdle.
Plans by West Coast Energy to erect four wind turbines at Carsington Pastures have been described as an “unwelcome alien feature” by the Peak Park Planning Authority.

According to a Peak Park consultation report the proposed turbine towers would be intrusive, prominent features which would spoil the view.

The report said: “It is important to recognise that the moving blades of the wind farm will attract attention. Apart from periods of bad weather, the wind farm will be seen at a distance.

“It will spoil the relatively unbroken skyline which is a welcome landscape feature of the National Park.

“Conservation of both the park and its setting are particularly important for not only it is one of most visited National Parks in the world, but it is a beautiful rural counterpoint within which there is limited or no awareness of the nearby large conurbations.

“Although some views will be at a distance, it is considered that acceptance of the windfarm would introduce an unwelcome alien feature which would diminish the enjoyment of the area.”

Neil Exton, land and development manager for West Coast Energy, said: “We are obviously disappointed with the report and do not feel that it fully reflects the application.

“We take issue with certain points of the report that suggest we chose an obscure selection of viewpoints within the national park in order to conclude that the impact on the landscape would be minimal.

“The chosen viewpoints were agreed in a meeting with the Peak Park authority so they are equally to blame for that.”

The report concludes that the Peak Park Planning Authority recommends that Derbyshire Dales District Council refuses the application.

This is on the grounds it would cause unacceptable harm to National Park landscape and that acceptance would create a precedent for unnecessary wind farms around the National Park.

The final decision will be made at a district council planning meeting later this year.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 April 2007 1:35 PM
  • Source: Matlock Mercury
  • Location: Matlock
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Mike Woolley,

Wirksworth 21/04/2007 12:18:09
Why am I not surprised? I think the turbines could have be an iconic feature for Carsington and help to draw in more visitors. It would be a bold step and recognition of the changing way we have to view our energy consumption.
2

Lone Starr,

Matlock Bath 13/07/2007 16:49:12
If these plans are rejected then it will show how truly backward-thinking Derbyshire Dales District Council are in their policy. We desperately need to embrace renewable energy before it is too late. Personally I think that wind-turbines are aesthetically pleasing and rather a majestic addition to a landscape. I would not complain if they were to build them opposite my house! The sooner the government changes the legislation on this the better.
3

Nimby,

Derbyshire Dales 15/08/2007 08:57:13
To Lone Starr: Then I suggest you contact West Coast Energy and get some installed on the hill at the back of Matlock Bath, its nice and high and windy!
4

,

30/08/2007 16:59:14
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

Stubbborn mule,

Matlock 23/10/2007 12:39:14
Well it's time Derbyshire went a bit greener. The new Sainsbury's may encourage more use of cars so in a way we need to give something back.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.